<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forgive your users; even when they are drunk!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilityfriction.com/2008/10/09/forgive-your-users-even-when-they-are-drunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilityfriction.com/2008/10/09/forgive-your-users-even-when-they-are-drunk/</link>
	<description>Usability shouldn't be a drag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10 Ways to Improve Usability When You Thought it Was Too Late</title>
		<link>http://usabilityfriction.com/2008/10/09/forgive-your-users-even-when-they-are-drunk/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Ways to Improve Usability When You Thought it Was Too Late</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityfriction.com/?p=190#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] Confirmation: Make actions 2 step by prompting the user to confirm the action they have requested. Confirmation steps increase the friction of the interface and can be annoying if used too often. You don&#8217;t need confirmation steps if the actions are easily undo-able (for example the &#8220;Are you sure you want to delete the file&#8221; dialogue in Windows XP is unnecessary as the files can be simply removed from the trash). You don&#8217;t need to just have OK/Cancel dialogues to add a confirmation step, it could be an additional separate action in an &#8220;Arm/Fire&#8221; sense. I wrote an article about Google mail&#8217;s creative use of a confirmation step to forgive users even when they are drunk! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Confirmation: Make actions 2 step by prompting the user to confirm the action they have requested. Confirmation steps increase the friction of the interface and can be annoying if used too often. You don&#8217;t need confirmation steps if the actions are easily undo-able (for example the &#8220;Are you sure you want to delete the file&#8221; dialogue in Windows XP is unnecessary as the files can be simply removed from the trash). You don&#8217;t need to just have OK/Cancel dialogues to add a confirmation step, it could be an additional separate action in an &#8220;Arm/Fire&#8221; sense. I wrote an article about Google mail&#8217;s creative use of a confirmation step to forgive users even when they are drunk! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Towers</title>
		<link>http://usabilityfriction.com/2008/10/09/forgive-your-users-even-when-they-are-drunk/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Towers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityfriction.com/?p=190#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, great comment - I completely agree! By far the best way is to let people do what they want and let them reverse any mistake - Google use this approach to good effect when you delete an email in gmail. However, once you&#039;ve clicked send on an email it&#039;s gone so there&#039;s no way you could undo it using that approach. By using a series of questions that you have to think about, Mail Goggles stops you being able to &#039;click through&#039; and ignore the warnings.

You&#039;d be amazed how right you are when you say people click through notices without reading them - have a look at this: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080923-study-confirms-users-are-idiots.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, great comment &#8211; I completely agree! By far the best way is to let people do what they want and let them reverse any mistake &#8211; Google use this approach to good effect when you delete an email in gmail. However, once you&#8217;ve clicked send on an email it&#8217;s gone so there&#8217;s no way you could undo it using that approach. By using a series of questions that you have to think about, Mail Goggles stops you being able to &#8216;click through&#8217; and ignore the warnings.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be amazed how right you are when you say people click through notices without reading them &#8211; have a look at this: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080923-study-confirms-users-are-idiots.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080923-study-confirms-users-are-idiots.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wotton</title>
		<link>http://usabilityfriction.com/2008/10/09/forgive-your-users-even-when-they-are-drunk/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilityfriction.com/?p=190#comment-70</guid>
		<description>The problem is that people quickly learn to click through confirmations without thought, and all you&#039;ve accomplished is to annoy someone a little more - it&#039;s a much better principle to forgive your users by making sure almost all actions can be undone easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that people quickly learn to click through confirmations without thought, and all you&#8217;ve accomplished is to annoy someone a little more &#8211; it&#8217;s a much better principle to forgive your users by making sure almost all actions can be undone easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
